Consequences, Not Censorship

As a writer and as a librarian, issues of censorship really push my buttons.  As a writer, I want, nay need, to be able to say what I want to say in the manner I wish to say it.  As a librarian, I value the need for people to read or experience media of any type and in the manner they wish to do so.  For me these needs are fundamental to a civilized society.

That being said, I always hesitate to comment on “political” matters, both in my writing and in my personal life.  I love observing debates from a distance while forming my own conclusions and tend not to engage.  It’s hard because politics, especially those of a partisan variety, seem to encroach into every aspect of life these days.  I fear we’ve gotten to the point that my choice of frozen yogurt over ice cream is indicative of my political leanings.  However, in this case, my concerns over censorship and its attendant issues is overriding my usual reticence to engage.

This week, Dr. Laura Schlessinger announced that she is ending her long-running radio show in order to “regain my first amendment rights“.  After a five-minute long rant in which the infamous “N-word” was used over fifteen times, she has apparently taken a great deal of flak from people and organizations that were offended.  She further said that:

“I want to be able to say what’s on my mind and in my heart and what I think is helpful and useful without somebody getting angry, some special interest group deciding this is the time to silence a voice of dissent and attack affiliates, attack sponsors. I’m sort of done with that.”

I’ve never been a fan of Dr. Laura and have only heard sound bites from her radio show on the occasions when her commentary caused a kerfluffle (such as now).  However, if a governmental entity such as the FCC or the city from which she broadcasts had shut down her show over her statements, I’d be in her corner.  I don’t agree with much she has to say and feel she misses the point on a lot of issues (including the subject of her most recent rant), but she has a right to express her opinion.  That’s what the first amendment is all about: we all have the right to be blowhards on our pet subjects.

That’s not what’s happening here.  By her own statements, she essentially wants to say what she thinks without being criticized or without people acting on that criticism.  This isn’t a matter of censorship; it’s a matter of consequences.

The day following the rant she issued an apology for it, acknowledging that the means by which she tried to deliver her point served no one well.  However, she apparently also believes that this apology should end the criticism.  It hasn’t.  And this shouldn’t be surprising at all.  Whether or not the criticisms of her statements are valid or not, they are the consequence of her speech.  That’s part of the deal.

The good doctor ended her infamous rant with the following epilogue: “If you’re that hypersensitive about color and don’t have a sense of humor, don’t marry outside of your race.”  I would advise Dr. Schlessinger that if you’re that hypersensitive about criticism and don’t have a sense of humor, don’t host a controversial radio show. 

Apparently she came to the same conclusion.

About Shedrick

I am a professional librarian and a part-time writer that's working to do that the other way around. I currently live in North Texas in the lovely city of Denton (“The Home of Happiness“) with my lovely wife and the obligatory demon-spawn cats. When not writing, gaming, or watching cheezy kung-fu flicks, I can sometimes be found in a pub (or the American equivalent) enjoying a fine brew.
This entry was posted in Ramblings and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Consequences, Not Censorship

  1. Smander says:

    I have to admit my ignorance here. What is the infamous “n word”? I know it’s probably really obvious and I’ll be embarrassed when you tell me…but I’d rather just know. I have to agree with your views on censorship. I am also hesitant to voice my political or religious views (after having a heated debate with someone about their views on marriage) but this is something I feel strongly about as an English teacher, writer and reader. Thanks for sharing.

  2. Shedrick says:

    No worries…it may be more of an Americanism…

    The infamous “n-word” is the hateful racial slur “nigger”, if that helps. I dislike using the word but hopefully this gets it across.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s